<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/71238</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/71238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/71238</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 22:00:12 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/71238</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Linux Kernel Drops AI Tag Requirement, Uses Meta AI For Code Reviews</p>
<div><img width="800" height="484" src="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/LinuxMarketing.jpg?w=800" alt="" srcset="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/LinuxMarketing.jpg 3000w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/LinuxMarketing.jpg?resize=250, 151 250w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/LinuxMarketing.jpg?resize=400, 242 400w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/LinuxMarketing.jpg?resize=800, 484 800w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/LinuxMarketing.jpg?resize=1536, 929 1536w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/LinuxMarketing.jpg?resize=2048, 1239 2048w" data-attachment-id="384113" data-permalink="https://hackaday.com/2019/10/31/linuxs-marketing-problem/linuxmarketing/" data-orig-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/LinuxMarketing.jpg" data-orig-size="3000,1815" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="LinuxMarketing" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.flickr.com/photos/65143725@N08/5927271192&quot;&gt;&amp;#8220;Penguins&amp;#8221;&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.flickr.com/photos/65143725@N08&quot;&gt;TomaLaPlaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;" data-large-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/LinuxMarketing.jpg?w=800"></div><p>Since we last covered the way that the Linux Kernel project has been dealing with the influx of code created using LLM-based coding assistants, all the way <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hackaday.com/2026/04/14/new-linux-kernel-rules-put-the-onus-on-humans-for-ai-tool-usage/">back in April</a>, things have changed a lot, with most recently the Linux maintainers deciding to <a rel="nofollow" href="https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20261009083137.3-1-sashal@kernel.org/" target="_blank">fully drop the requirement</a> to mark LLM-assisted commits with the <code>Assisted-by</code> tag.</p><p>While not a fully uncontroversial decision – as also <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Dropping-Assisted-By-Req" target="_blank">reported by</a> Phoronix – with key maintainers already having made this decision it seems certain to proceed. This is not the only change made fairly recently, with a ‘Sashiko’ bot introduced that is supposed to handle code reviews.</p><p>In a July LKML post [Linus Torvalds] <a rel="nofollow" href="https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/CAHk-=wi4zC+Ze8e+p3tMv8TtG_80KzsZ1syL9anBtmEh5Z40vg@mail.gmail.com/" target="_blank">defends this decision</a>, with a <a rel="nofollow" href="https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260818212923.2725202-1-kuba@kernel.org/" target="_blank">follow-up post</a> in August by [Jakub Kicinski] it being stated that budget has been secured for using Meta’s LLMs, using said LLM-based resources for reviewing patches, as well as creating and editing commit messages. As noted by [Jakub] they’re running multiple frontier models on each patch to try and weed out confabulations.</p><p>Whether this will prove to be the right decision remains to be seen. Whereas most open source projects have firmly banished or heavily curtailed LLM-based contributions on slop, copyright as well as licensing grounds, the Linux Kernel project may be an interesting experiment in what the outcome of the exact opposite approach will be.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>