<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/70747</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/70747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/70747</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 22:00:17 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/70747</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Synthetic Aperture Radar Drone Gets Interferometric Imaging</p>
<div><img width="800" height="450" src="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/sar_drone.png?w=800" alt="A drone is shown, carrying underneath it a white plastic box. On the side of the box are two patch antennas. A camera extends from one end of the box, and a large GPS antenna from the other end." srcset="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/sar_drone.png 1860w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/sar_drone.png?resize=250, 141 250w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/sar_drone.png?resize=400, 225 400w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/sar_drone.png?resize=800, 450 800w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/sar_drone.png?resize=1536, 864 1536w" data-attachment-id="1163789" data-permalink="https://hackaday.com/2026/09/28/synthetic-aperture-radar-drone-gets-interferometric-imaging/sar_drone/" data-orig-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/sar_drone.png" data-orig-size="1860,1046" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="sar_drone" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/sar_drone.png?w=800"></div><p>It’s been more than a year since [Henrik Forstén] built the first iteration of his synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) imaging drone, and he’s certainly been productive in the meantime. Not only did he develop a much more powerful autofocus algorithm to clean up the radar images, but he also extended the software to create <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hforsten.com/interferometric-synthetic-aperture-radar-drone.html" target="_blank">high-resolution interferometric images</a>.</p><p>The main limitation of the <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hackaday.com/2025/02/13/budget-minded-synthetic-aperture-radar-takes-to-the-skies/">original radar system</a> was the GPS, which only had a resolution of about one meter; the <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hforsten.com/synthetic-aperture-radar-autofocus-and-calibration.html" target="_blank">autofocus algorithm</a> owed much of its improved clarity to an improved estimation of the drone’s position. A simpler, though more expensive, solution was to add an RTK-capable GPS receiver. RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) receivers use a fixed ground station to constantly transmit a correction signal, letting them reach a couple centimeters of accuracy. Since the drone doesn’t actually need to know its position in real time, it can also use PPK (Post-Processing Kinematic) positioning, which compares recorded GPS signals after the flight to obtain similarly accurate positions.</p><p>[Henrik] also implemented a few other hardware improvements, including stabilizing the phase-locked loop used to generate the radar’s frequency sweep. The controller FPGA’s SD card interface had too low a bandwidth to record data in real time, so [Henrik] also implemented a simple, fast compression algorithm to speed that up. Most significantly, he also developed a program for interferometric imaging. The drone flies the same path twice at different altitudes; by comparing phase information from different passes, it’s possible to detect a target’s elevation. Normally, the radar program assumes constant elevation, making tall objects seem to lean toward the radar source; an interferogram, on the other hand, allowed [Henrik] to generate a detailed elevation map.</p><p>[Henrik] is no stranger to synthetic aperture radar; we’ve previously covered a <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hackaday.com/2019/08/15/bike-mounted-synthetic-aperture-radar-makes-detailed-images/">bike-mounted iteration</a> and a <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hackaday.com/2015/10/25/an-improvised-synthetic-aperture-radar/">budget SAR</a> system. If the concepts behind this are still a bit fuzzy, we’ve also covered a guide to <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hackaday.com/2014/03/17/radar-imaging-in-your-garage-synthetic-aperture-radar/">making your own SAR</a> setup.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>