<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/64550</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/64550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/64550</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 23:56:31 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/64550</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Grammarly’s ‘expert review’ is just missing the actual expertsA recently-added feature in Grammarly purports to improve users’ writing with help from the world's great writers and thinkers — and some tech journalists, too.</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>