<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/55378</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/55378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/55378</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:17:06 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/55378</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>“Spotify’s intent seems clear”: US senators call for FTC probe into Spotify’s subscription bundles – here’s why</p>
<p><img width="2000" height="1500" src="https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Spotify-logo-new-June-2025@2000x1500.jpg" alt="Spotify logo on a smartphone against a yellow and black background" srcset="https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Spotify-logo-new-June-2025@2000x1500.jpg 2000w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Spotify-logo-new-June-2025@2000x1500-400x300.jpg 400w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Spotify-logo-new-June-2025@2000x1500-800x600.jpg 800w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Spotify-logo-new-June-2025@2000x1500-696x522.jpg 696w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Spotify-logo-new-June-2025@2000x1500-1392x1044.jpg 1392w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Spotify-logo-new-June-2025@2000x1500-1068x801.jpg 1068w"></p><p>Two US senators are calling on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to launch an investigation into <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/brands/spotify/">Spotify</a> over claims that it has forced Premium subscribers into higher-priced “bundled subscriptions” without their knowledge or consent.</p><p>Last Friday, Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Democratic Senator Ben Ray Luján of New Mexico submitted a formal letter urging the FTC to examine Spotify’s bundling services — specifically, its combination of music streaming and audiobook services under one plan.</p><ul><li><strong>READ MORE: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/music/spotify-hifi-lossless-streaming-leaked-code/">Is Spotify’s HiFi lossless streaming actually coming? Leaked code says yes</a></strong></li>
</ul><p>Under US regulations, digital music providers can pay a lower music royalty rate if their paid music subscription offering is bundled with other legitimate product offerings.</p><p>The letter argues that Spotify has “exploited” this rule by reclassifying its Premium Individual, Duo, and Family subscription plans as “bundles” after it began including audiobook access last March.</p><p>“Spotify’s intent seems clear – to slash the statutory royalties it pays to songwriters and music publishers. Not only has this harmed our creative community, but this action has also harmed consumers,” it <a href="https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/services/files/42F8C53C-F248-45A3-8E37-EC4A6BEEA994" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">states</a>.</p><p>Last year, the <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/industry/spotify-royalties-lawsuit-audiobook-bundling/">Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) sued Spotify for allegedly underpaying royalties to songwriters and publishers</a> by tens of millions of dollars.</p><p>The tech giant added 15 hours of audiobook access to its Premium tiers, raising the price to $12 for individuals and $20 for families at the time.</p><p>In the suit, MLC argued that after adding audiobook access, Spotify “improperly” categorised its service in a way that would significantly reduce the amount of royalties it paid despite there being “no change to the Premium plan and no corresponding reduction to the revenues that Spotify generates.”</p><p>The change reportedly caused a $230 million loss for publishers in its first year, according to Danielle Aguirre, executive vice president and general counsel of the National Music Publishers’ Association.</p><p>Blackburn and Luján’s letter also notes that while Spotify has quietly relaunched its music-only “Basic Plan” following backlash from its “bundling” move, this plan is “hidden” from most users and only available to certain existing subscribers.</p><p>“As of January 2025, only a handful of Spotify’s millions of Premium Plan subscribers switched back to a music-only ‘Basic’ plan,” the letter states.</p><p>In a statement to <a href="https://variety.com/2025/digital/news/senators-spotify-bundling-plan-harms-consumers-1236436774/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow"><em>Variety</em></a>, a Spotify spokesperson defended the company’s practices, saying that users were notified a month in advance of any price increases and that the platform offers “easy cancellations as well as multiple plans for users to consider”.</p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/music/spotify-ftc-probe-bundling/">“Spotify’s intent seems clear”: US senators call for FTC probe into Spotify’s subscription bundles – here’s why</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/">MusicTech</a>.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>