<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/54789</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/54789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/54789</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 22:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/54789</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Two Bits, Four Bits, a Twelve-bit Oscilloscope</p>
<div><img width="800" height="462" src="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/scope_e40540.png?w=800" alt="" srcset="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/scope_e40540.png 800w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/scope_e40540.png?resize=250, 144 250w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/scope_e40540.png?resize=400, 231 400w" data-attachment-id="786664" data-permalink="https://hackaday.com/2025/06/10/two-bits-four-bits-a-twelve-bit-oscilloscope/scope_e40540/" data-orig-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/scope_e40540.png" data-orig-size="800,462" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="scope_e40540" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/scope_e40540.png?w=400" data-large-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/scope_e40540.png?w=800"></div><p>Until recently, hobby-grade digital oscilloscopes were mostly, at most, 8-bit sampling. However, newer devices offer 12-bit conversion. Does it matter? Depends. [Kiss Analog] shows <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHYlL08O5IQ" target="_blank">where a 12-bit scope may outperform an 8-bit one</a>.</p><p>It may seem obvious, of course. When you store data in 8-bit resolution and zoom in on it, you simply have less resolution. However, seeing the difference on real data is enlightening.</p><p></p><p>To perform the test, he used three scopes to freeze on a fairly benign wave. Then he cranked up the vertical scale and zoomed in horizontally. The 8-bit scopes reveal a jagged line where the digitizer is off randomly by a bit or so. The 12-bit was able to zoom in on a smooth waveform.</p><p>Of course, if you set the scope to zoom in in real time, you don’t have that problem as much, because you divide a smaller range by 256 (the number of slices in 8 bits). However, if you have that once-in-a-blue-moon waveform captured, you might appreciate not having to try to capture it again with different settings.</p><p>A scope doesn’t have to be <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hackaday.com/2019/10/10/the-cutest-oscilloscope-ever-made/">physically large to do a 12-bit sample</a>. Digital sampling for scopes <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hackaday.com/2024/06/17/a-brief-look-inside-a-homebrew-digital-sampler-from-1979/">has come a long way</a>.</p><p></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>