<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/50062</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/50062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/50062</guid>
	<pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2025 22:00:57 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/50062</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Taking A $15 Casio F91W 5,000 Meters Underwater</p>
<div><img width="800" height="500" src="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/depth_testing_casio_f91w.png?w=800" alt="" srcset="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/depth_testing_casio_f91w.png 1500w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/depth_testing_casio_f91w.png?resize=250, 156 250w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/depth_testing_casio_f91w.png?resize=400, 250 400w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/depth_testing_casio_f91w.png?resize=800, 500 800w" data-attachment-id="757181" data-permalink="https://hackaday.com/2025/02/01/taking-a-15-casio-f91w-5000-meters-underwater/depth_testing_casio_f91w/" data-orig-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/depth_testing_casio_f91w.png" data-orig-size="1500,938" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="depth_testing_casio_f91w" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/depth_testing_casio_f91w.png?w=400" data-large-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/depth_testing_casio_f91w.png?w=800"></div><p>When considering our favorite spy movies and kin that involve deep-sea diving, we’d generally expect to see some high-end watch that costs thousands of dollars and is specially engineered to withstand the immense pressures kilometers below the ocean’s surface. Yet what about a humble Casio F91W that can be bought for about $15 if it’s the genuine article and not one of the millions of fakes? Over at the <em>Watches of Espionage</em> site they figured that they’d dress up one of these famous watches to give it the best possible shot at <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.watchesofespionage.com/blogs/woe-dispatch/casio-f91w-diving-underwater-pressure-test" target="_blank">surviving the crushing pressures at a depth of 5 km</a>.</p><p>The actual modification to the F91W was pretty mild, involving nothing but a ‘hydro-mod’ whereby oil is used to replace the air inside the watch case. Since oil is incompressible, nothing bad should happen to the watch. Theoretically at least. The Watch-Under-Test (WUT) was strapped to a US Navy’s CURV 21 remotely operated vehicle and dunked into the ocean before starting its descend into the inky darkness of the deep sea.</p><p>Although only hitting a measly 4,950 km, the watch survived just fine, showing that even if you’re a secret US operative on a deep-dive espionage mission, all you really need is one of these Casio watches.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>