<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/48505</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/48505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/48505</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 18:50:11 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/48505</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>UK government considering allowing tech companies to train AI on copyrighted content</p>
<p><img width="2000" height="1500" src="https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/AI-sound-waves-2@2000x1500.jpg" alt="AI sound waves" srcset="https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/AI-sound-waves-2@2000x1500.jpg 2000w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/AI-sound-waves-2@2000x1500-400x300.jpg 400w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/AI-sound-waves-2@2000x1500-800x600.jpg 800w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/AI-sound-waves-2@2000x1500-696x522.jpg 696w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/AI-sound-waves-2@2000x1500-1392x1044.jpg 1392w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/AI-sound-waves-2@2000x1500-1068x801.jpg 1068w"></p><p>The UK government is considering whether tech companies should be allowed to train AI on copyrighted content. Campaigners keen to protect creatives’ and artists’ rights have expressed their opposition.</p><p><a href="https://www.techuk.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">TechUK</a> welcomed the discussion, proposing that tech firms should be exempt from copyright laws when training AI. If accepted, the proposal will allow <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/brands/google">Google</a>, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://google.com/brands/openai">OpenAI</a> and more to bypass current copyright laws. However, creatives will supposedly be allowed to “reserve their rights” and “opt-out” of AI training.</p><ul><li><strong>READ MORE: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/industry/aiformusic-roland-umg-principles-for-music-creation-with-ai/">“Human-created works must be respected”: 50 major music tech brands sign Principles for Music Creation with AI</a></strong></li>
</ul><p>MP Chris Bryant insists it will be a “win win” for both creatives and tech firms. “This is about giving greater control in a difficult and complex set of circumstances to creators and rights holders,” Bryant tells <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/dec/17/uk-proposes-letting-tech-firms-use-copyrighted-work-to-train-ai?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow"><em>The Guardian</em></a>. “We intend it to lead to more licensing of content, which is potentially a new revenue stream for creators.”</p><p>Despite Bryant’s positive outlook, the nature of AI training is already murky. Back in January, OpenAI told <a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/01/07/openai-warns-copyright-crackdown-could-doom-chatgpt/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow"><em>The Telegraph</em></a> that it ‘complies’ with copyright laws – but it noted that “legally, copyright law does not forbid training.”</p><p>Furthermore, when the <em>BBC</em> blocked ChatGPT from using its content for training, OpenAI said that it would be “impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials.”</p><p>“Limiting training data to public domain books and drawings created more than a century ago might yield an interesting experiment,” the company explained in <em>The Telegraph</em>. “But it would not provide AI systems that meet the needs of today’s citizens.”</p><p>Creatives’ rights campaigner Beeban Kidron says she is “very disappointed” with the proposal. “The government is consulting on giving away the creativity and livelihoods of the UK creative sector,” she adds.</p><p>The news comes as British composer Ed Newton-Rex’s anti-AI statement has garnered over 37,000 signatures. Backed by <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/artists/radiohead">Radiohead</a> singer <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/artists/thom-yorke">Thom Yorke</a>, <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/artists/kate-bush">Kate Bush</a>, The Smith’s Robert Smith and more, the <a href="https://www.aitrainingstatement.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">Statement On AI Training</a> asserts that “the unlicensed use of creative works for training generative AI is a major, unjust threat to the livelihoods of the people behind those works, and must not be permitted.”</p><p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/artists/paul-mccartney">Paul McCartney</a> also spoke out against AI just last week. <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/artists/the-beatles">The Beatles</a> legend labelled the “mass copyright theft” of companies as a “very sad thing indeed.”</p><p>“We[’ve] got to be careful about it because it could just take over,” he reflects [as reported by <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/dec/10/paul-mccartney-ai-warning-uk-debates-copyright-laws" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow"><em>The Guardian</em></a>]. “We don’t want that to happen, particularly for the young composers and writers… If AI wipes that out, that would be a very sad thing indeed.”</p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/industry/uk-allowing-tech-firms-to-train-ai-copyrighted-content/">UK government considering allowing tech companies to train AI on copyrighted content</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/">MusicTech</a>.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>