<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/43186</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/43186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/43186</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 22:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/43186</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Handheld Oscilloscope Meter Reviewed</p>
<div><img width="800" height="450" src="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/zt.png?w=800" alt="" srcset="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/zt.png 800w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/zt.png?resize=250, 141 250w, https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/zt.png?resize=400, 225 400w" data-attachment-id="700232" data-permalink="https://hackaday.com/2024/08/14/handheld-oscilloscope-meter-reviewed/zt/" data-orig-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/zt.png" data-orig-size="800,450" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="zt" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/zt.png?w=400" data-large-file="https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/zt.png?w=800" tabindex="0" role="button"></div><p>We live in a time where there’s virtually no excuse not to have <em>some</em> kind of oscilloscope. As [IMSAI Guy] shows in a recent video, for what you might expect to pay for a decent meter, you can now <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-_h-hVkxc" target="_blank">get one that includes a scope</a>. There are several options out there but it is hard to know how much to spend to get the best possible product. The Zoyi ZT-702S that he looks at costs under $80. But is it worth it?</p><p>Scopes that connect to your PC are often very inexpensive. You can also find little toy scopes that use a microcontroller and a little LCD screen. Even though the specs on these are usually appalling, they will still let you visualize what’s happening in a circuit. Sure, you want an expensive bench scope with lots of channels sometimes, but often, you just need to see a signal in broad strokes. Having a scope and a meter together is very handy.</p><p></p><p>The little meter claims 10 MHz bandwidth and 48 megasamples per second in scope mode. The meter claims true RMS and 9999 counts. The internal battery charges from USB-C. As you might expect, the meter portion works well enough for a basic meter. The scope reacts well up to 5 MHz. It isn’t necessarily the best scope in the world, but for $80 it seemed quite adequate. The probe compensation wasn’t able to quite make a square wave square, but you still got the idea.</p><p>As commenters on the video pointed out, there is a newer model that has two channels (at a slightly higher price tag). They also point out that there are dozens of similar devices at different price points, and everyone has their favorite.</p><p>If you have hobby-level cash, we’d suggest a higher-end scope meter like <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hackaday.com/2021/12/12/kerry-wong-is-really-into-scope-meters/">an OWON or Hantek</a> since the professional brands are still very expensive. We wonder what the designer of <a rel="nofollow" href="https://hackaday.com/2023/04/14/retro-gadgets-the-1983-pocket-oscilloscope/">1983’s Pocket-O-Scope</a> would think of these modern devices.</p><p></p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>