<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/36169</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/36169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/36169</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 13:38:53 +0100</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/36169</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>Music labels suing Twitter/X for copyright infringement partially allowed to move forward with lawsuit</p>
<p><img width="2000" height="1500" src="https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/x-twitter@2000x1500.jpg" alt="A phone showing ther X logo. Both the Twitter / X logos are blurred in the background." srcset="https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/x-twitter@2000x1500.jpg 2000w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/x-twitter@2000x1500-400x300.jpg 400w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/x-twitter@2000x1500-800x600.jpg 800w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/x-twitter@2000x1500-696x522.jpg 696w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/x-twitter@2000x1500-1392x1044.jpg 1392w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/x-twitter@2000x1500-1068x801.jpg 1068w"></p><p>The coalition of music labels suing <a href="https://musictech.com/brands/twitter/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">X (Twitter)</a> for alleged copyright infringement are permitted to move forward with <em>parts</em> of their lawsuit, it has been reported.</p><p>In June 2023, it was revealed that 17 music industry bodies – including Sony Music Publishing, Universal Music Group, Warner Chappell, BMG and more – were seeking to claim <a href="https://musictech.com/news/industry/twitter-sued-for-copyright-infringement/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">$250 million in damages</a> for “hundreds of thousands” of alleged infringements of approximately 1,700 pieces of music.</p><ul><li><strong><strong>READ MORE: </strong><a href="https://musictech.com/news/industry/uk-recorded-music-revenues-hits-new-high-since-2001/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">“Music is on the right track”: UK recorded music revenues hit new high for the first time since 2001</a></strong></li>
</ul><p>Now, as <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/5/24091667/twitter-music-label-legal-trouble-lawsuit-nmpa" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow"><em>The Verge</em></a> reports, US District Judge Aleta A. Trauger has partially denied <a href="https://musictech.com/news/industry/x-files-motion-to-dismiss-250-million-copyright-lawsuit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">X’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit</a>, stating that it’s still not clear “to what extent X Corp may be liable for the infringing acts of users on its platform” in a new filing.</p><p>X’s motion to dismiss claims that it allegedly failed to respond to infringement claims in a timely manner and didn’t take appropriate action against “repeat infringers” has also been denied.</p><p>However, the judge has also agreed to dismiss allegations put forth by the coalition (the National Music Publishers’ Association, or NMPA) that X engaged in direct copyright infringement and that the platform is “vicariously liable” for direct infringements by users.</p><p>As opposed to other social media platforms, X has reportedly not negotiated music licensing agreements with music copyright holders. This has also been addressed in the filing document.</p><p>It states, “The plaintiffs complain that, ‘[w]hile the Twitter platform began as a destination for short text-based messages,’ it has since become a ‘hot destination for multimedia content, with music- infused videos being of particular and paramount importance.’ There are lawful ways for a social media company to offer such media – particularly, by entering into licensing agreements with rights holders, as TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Snapchat have done.</p><p>“Copyright licences, though, typically must be paid for, and X/Twitter is, the plaintiffs suggest, effectively trying to generate the kind of revenue that one would expect as a lawful purveyor of music and other media, without incurring the cost of actually paying for the licences.”</p><p><em><strong>Proceedings now remain ongoing. View the <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24459497-twitter-music-label-lawsuit?responsive=1&amp;title=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">full document</a>, as shared by The Verge, to find out more.</strong></em></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/industry/music-labels-suing-twitter-x-partially-allowed-move-forward/">Music labels suing Twitter/X for copyright infringement partially allowed to move forward with lawsuit</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/">MusicTech</a>.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>