<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/28936</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/28936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/28936</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 13:58:57 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/28936</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>“I’m curious how copying a product and selling it at the exact same price is a ‘not for profit’”: Loopop slams Behringer’s “not-for-profit” claims</p>
<p><img width="2000" height="1500" src="https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/music-tech-news-banner@2000x1500.jpg" alt="The MusicTech logo with the word &quot;news&quot; repeated in the background" srcset="https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/music-tech-news-banner@2000x1500.jpg 2000w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/music-tech-news-banner@2000x1500-200x150.jpg 200w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/music-tech-news-banner@2000x1500-400x300.jpg 400w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/music-tech-news-banner@2000x1500-324x243.jpg 324w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/music-tech-news-banner@2000x1500-648x486.jpg 648w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/music-tech-news-banner@2000x1500-800x600.jpg 800w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/music-tech-news-banner@2000x1500-696x522.jpg 696w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/music-tech-news-banner@2000x1500-1392x1044.jpg 1392w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/music-tech-news-banner@2000x1500-1068x801.jpg 1068w"></p><p>Loopop has fired back at music tech brand <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/brands/behringer/">Behringer</a> after the brand once again took aim at the product reviewer recently, claiming “‘<a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/gear/behringer-hits-out-at-media-outlets-and-influencers/">influencers’ have decided not to support us anymore</a> because we don’t provide free products for reviews”.</p><ul><li><strong>READ MORE: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/behringer-outlines-gear-review-policies/">“We don’t pay to play”: Behringer further outlines policies on supplying free gear to reviewers</a></strong></li>
</ul><p>In a post to X made yesterday, Loopop questions Behringer’s ethical stance following claims made by the company in August that they’re a “not-for-profit” organisation. The post features a screenshot of Behringer’s Arturia Keystep clone, the Swing, alongside the original and set at the same price on the online gear store, Sweetwater.</p><p>It reads: “I’m curious how copying a successful, in-production product and selling it at the exact same price is a ‘not for profit’ or ‘empowering the ones who have not’, as opposed to, say, simply making a profit off someone else’s investment in product design (source: Sweetwater Oct 2)”</p><blockquote data-width="500" data-dnt="true"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I’m curious how copying a successful, in-production product and selling it at the exact same price is a “not for profit” or “empowering the ones who have not”, as opposed to, say, simply making a profit off someone else’s investment in product design (source: Sweetwater Oct 2) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://t.co/0sAo44qbNA">pic.twitter.com/0sAo44qbNA</a></p><p>— Loopop Music (@loopopmusic) <a rel="nofollow" href="https://twitter.com/loopopmusic/status/1708776602245406813?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 2, 2023</a></p></blockquote><p></p><p>“I’m no FTC lawyer,” he responds to one X user, “but it sounds deceptive to me to tell your customers you’re a non-profit that empowers the have-nots, but then go and sell the same product at the same price “have-nots” buy from for-profit companies (and yes, a cheaper copy sucks too)”</p><p>The claim Loopop’s referring to was made in a Facebook post by Behringer in August. The post reads: “Purpose before Profit. At Behringer [sic] we pay zero dividends to shareholders and we reinvest all our earnings. This is the reason why we’re selling our products at such low prices and at times even below cost.”</p><p>In the comments, Behringer goes on to say, “If profit was out [sic] focus, we wouldn’t sell our products at such low prices. At times we’re even selling them below cost. We are a ‘not for profit’ org as all our earnings are reinvested.”</p><p><em><strong>Despite all this drama, Behringer is continuing to tease and launch loads of new products. Stick around on musictech.com to discover <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/guides/buyers-guide/behringer-synthesizers/">every synth, drum machine and controller Behringer is working on</a>.</strong></em></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/gear/loopop-says-behringers-not-for-profit-claims-are-deceptive/">“I’m curious how copying a product and selling it at the exact same price is a ‘not for profit’”: Loopop slams Behringer’s “not-for-profit” claims</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/">MusicTech</a>.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>