<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/28438</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/28438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/28438</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 23:01:33 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/28438</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>MetaMask ‘glitch’ caused opBNB recommended fees to be too high: Report</p>
<p><img src="https://images.cointelegraph.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,onerror=redirect,quality=90,width=840/https://s3.cointelegraph.com/uploads/2023-09/97840e4e-bb36-4136-9462-04fe76e714e6.jpg" alt="image"></p><p>According to BNB Chain, MetaMask was averaging recommended fees from multiple networks, causing opBNB recommended fees to be too high.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>