<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by Vlad Masslove in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/28315</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/28315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/28315</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:09:53 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/28315</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by Vlad Masslove in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>NFTs could be used to "print" the ownership to a blockchain but not for selling art itself. For instance, it's like a public proof certificate of something: i.e. - ownership, qualification, copyright, etc.. But it seems it all went the wrong way again. And now it's the turn of AI, hopefully it will bring the positive results. We'll see...<br />#NFT #Blockchain #decentralization #MusicIndustry #Art #Music</p>
]]></description>
	<dc:creator>Vlad Masslove</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>