<?xml version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[PublMe - Space: Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/26372</link>
	<atom:link href="https://publme.space/reactions/v/26372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	
	<item>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://publme.space/reactions/v/26372</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:26:10 +0200</pubDate>
	<link>https://publme.space/reactions/v/26372</link>
	<title><![CDATA[Posted Reaction by PublMe bot in PublMe]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<p>“I don’t think people can tell” the difference between original and re-issued Prophet-10, says Jungle’s J Lloyd</p>
<p><img width="2000" height="1500" src="https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/J-Lloyd-Prophet-10@2000x1500.jpg" alt="J Lloyd next to Prophet 10 synth" srcset="https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/J-Lloyd-Prophet-10@2000x1500.jpg 2000w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/J-Lloyd-Prophet-10@2000x1500-200x150.jpg 200w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/J-Lloyd-Prophet-10@2000x1500-400x300.jpg 400w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/J-Lloyd-Prophet-10@2000x1500-324x243.jpg 324w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/J-Lloyd-Prophet-10@2000x1500-648x486.jpg 648w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/J-Lloyd-Prophet-10@2000x1500-800x600.jpg 800w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/J-Lloyd-Prophet-10@2000x1500-696x522.jpg 696w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/J-Lloyd-Prophet-10@2000x1500-1392x1044.jpg 1392w, https://musictech.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/J-Lloyd-Prophet-10@2000x1500-1068x801.jpg 1068w"></p><p>J Lloyd, one half of UK band <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/artists/jungle/">Jungle</a>, says that “I don’t think people can really tell” the difference between the re-issued version of the <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/brands/sequential/">Sequential</a> Prophet-10 synthesizer and the original.</p><ul><li><strong>READ MORE: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/reviews/hardware-instruments/sequential-trigon-6-review-dave-smith/">Sequential Trigon-6 is Dave Smith’s final love letter to American synth icons</a></strong></li>
</ul><p>The highly-regarded and sought-after Prophet-10 – the first-ever polyphonic synth – was released in 1977 by Dave Smith’s Sequential brand. Since then, the company rehashed the legendary synth, with a re-issued, cheaper version being launched in 2020.</p><p>While a vintage Prophet-10 will set you back about $10k today, and a re-issued Prophet-10 Rev. 4 costs just under $5,000 on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.thomann.de/intl/sequential_prophet_10.htm?offid=1&amp;affid=2022">Thomann</a>, J Lloyd believes there to be no significant difference in sound between the two.</p><p>“I don’t think people can really tell, to be honest with you,” Lloyd says on the latest episode of the <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/shows/podcasts/my-forever-studio/my-forever-studio-jungle-j-lloyd-volcano/">My Forever Studio</a> podcast. “I could play a Prophet-10 – the new one – and I don’t think you’d be able to go ‘cool, that’s the old one, that’s the new one’. Do you know, I mean?”</p><p>“Okay, if you’re a gear guy, cool, I’ll get an old one but they’re always just a little bit fucked,” he says, referring to the wear and tear state of vintage synths.</p><p></p><p>J Lloyd isn’t the first artist to publicly praise Sequential’s impressive synth catalogue. <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/artists/tame-impala/">Tame Impala</a> recently described the sound of the <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/music/tame-impala-sequential-pro-one-is-his-favourite-synth/">Sequential Pro One as “crying in outer space”</a>.</p><p>“I just thought it sounded incredible, you know?” He said. “The Pro One to this day is still one of my favourite synths. I guess just because of that reason, because of that time. It had this sound that I just fell in love with.”</p><p>In 2021, MusicTech reviewed the 2020 <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/reviews/hardware-instruments/review-sequential-prophet-10/">Sequential Prophet-10 Rev.4</a>, describing its sound as “fat, lush” and “fantastic”.</p><p>We said: “Think about so many of the tricks synths rely on to capture your interest, whether it’s a slew of onboard effects or multiple synthesis personality types. The Rev4 Prophet is the opposite; it’s like climbing into a classic car which has made a couple of small concessions to the modern nature of driving.”</p><p><em><strong>Listen to My Forever Studio via our <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/shows/podcasts/">Podcasts</a> page.</strong></em></p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/news/gear/jungles-j-lloyd-on-prophet-10/">“I don’t think people can tell” the difference between original and re-issued Prophet-10, says Jungle’s J Lloyd</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://musictech.com/">MusicTech</a>.</p>]]></description>
	<dc:creator>PublMe bot</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>